
![]() |
National Geographic's 'Race' issueNational Geographic has tackled the issue of its own 'racist reporting' over its 130-year history in its April 2018 issue, dedicated to the topic of race. ![]() National Geographic's April 2018 cover. The media is often the ultimate judge of society, serving as gatekeepers to what makes the mainstream news or not. As a result, they’re judged harshly by society in turn, and rarely turn that critical eye on their own internal matters. So it’s refreshing when the media apologise of their own accord. That’s why National Geographic has been making headlines of its own recently. Long the Western world’s only idea of what went on beyond their borders, it admits it did little to push its readers beyond the stereotypes ingrained in white American culture.
Known for its iconic photography, National Geographic had long portrayed darker skinned people as uncivilised, and through its imagery, exoticised non-Western cultures for a largely white and Western audience…
Not seeing South AfricaSouth African content made the yellow-framed evaluation cut. When Mason commented on a 1962 National Geographic story about South Africa, he said: National Geographic’s story barely mentions any problems… There are no voices of black South Africans. That absence is as important as what is in there. The only black people are doing exotic dances… servants or workers. It’s bizarre, actually, to consider what the editors, writers, and photographers had to consciously not see.Addressing gender equality
She explains the editorial team expected there would be a fair amount of conversation around this issue, just as there was when they devoted an entire issue to ‘the gender revolution’, certainly leading the pack in that regard. While National Geographic reports reaction to the Race issue has been ‘90% positive’, the Chicago Tribune says there’s been mixed reaction to National Geographic’s 'racist past’ admission and acknowledgement, quoting Ron Stodghill, Midwest bureau chief for Time Magazine and associate professor at the University of Missouri’s School of Journalism, as stating, …within this push to create content that is a little edgy and also ‘sticky’ for readers, that revisionism is trendy now, and you can start to see that where folks are second-guessing their own coverage and I guess there’s valour in that, but it does raise other questions.Responsibility in reporting on real lives Stodghill calls it “the most profound recognition of omission about a people,” but adds they won’t get any pats on the back for addressing this, as “telling true stories about all kinds of people, without filters or biases, is not really an option for journalists, it’s a responsibility. It’s not being enlightened, it’s just being fair and thorough.” That said, it’s definitely a positive step forward and other publications have begun to relook at their own coverage to learn lessons from their past.
Goldberg’s letter: For Decades, Our Coverage Was Racist. To Rise Above Our Past, We Must Acknowledge It National Geographic’s April 2018 Race issue online Watch Al Jazeera further unpack the role media organisations should have in dismantling institutional racism: About Leigh AndrewsLeigh Andrews AKA the #MilkshakeQueen, is former Editor-in-Chief: Marketing & Media at Bizcommunity.com, with a passion for issues of inclusion, belonging, and of course, gourmet food and drinks! Now follow her travel adventures on YouTube @MidlifeMeander. View my profile and articles... |