If your employer brand isn’t lived, is it even real?

Image source: destinacigdem – 123RF.com

Hybrid vs. flexible work are often misunderstood or used interchangeably. Gen Z wants more than slogans. AI and automation are reshaping how we work faster than most leadership teams can respond.

In this environment, employer brands are under more scrutiny than ever. If your EVP isn’t experienced daily by your people, it doesn’t stand a chance.

Defining hybrid and flexible work matters

One of the first things I tackled in my session at the HRD Conference was the growing confusion between hybrid and flexible work. Hybrid refers to where employees work—typically a mix of remote and in-office days set by the company. Flexible work, by contrast, is about how, when, and where employees work. It allows autonomy over schedules and environments.

The distinction matters because when organisations promise flexibility but deliver hybrid, employees—especially Gen Z—feel misled. Flexibility has become a core talent currency, shaping how people assess opportunities, engagement, and loyalty. When your EVP promises autonomy but enforces rigidity, the disconnect is immediate—and damaging.

This isn’t just semantics. It’s central to the EVP gap: when promises don’t match lived experience, trust erodes—and so does engagement.

#BizTrends2025: Why employer branding will matter more than ever in 2025

Celeste Sirin  20 Jan 2025

The cost of EVP misalignment

Many companies have invested significant time and effort crafting strong employer brand messaging. They speak of flexibility, career growth, inclusion, and social responsibility. But the real challenge isn’t in defining the EVP. It’s in living it.

Only 33% of employees believe their organisation consistently delivers on its EVP, according to Gartner. That gap between intent and experience can be seen across countless day-to-day frustrations: commuting stress only to fight for meeting space on arrival at the office; policies that offer “flexibility” on paper but none in practice, forcing them to align with rigid archaic ineffective work structures.

The lived EVP: What’s missing

Here are some of the most common areas where EVP breaks down:

Innovation and collaboration are often celebrated in EVP messaging. But on the ground, Gen Z employees frequently find themselves operating within hierarchical structures where their voices are not heard and their contributions feel invisible. They’re looking for environments where input drives action - and where collaboration isn’t just invited, but integrated.

Career development is another area where reality often lags behind the promise. While employers highlight learning and development as a strength, the Deloitte 2024 Gen Z and Millennial Survey confirms that more than half of Gen Z employees say they feel unprepared for the future of work. What they actually want is real-time, rotational workplace learning and shadowing, on-the-job mentorship, and personalised coaching that accelerates career growth.

Future of employee benefits: Custom insurance solutions for diverse teams

Pauline Magoxo and Shaun Raizenberg  11 Feb 2025

Transparency is frequently listed in EVP statements, but many employees still don’t feel psychologically safe enough to speak up or challenge ideas. Meanwhile, well-being is promoted as a priority, yet hybrid and remote workers often report feelings of isolation and disconnection, with little structured support. Hybrid workers are particularly vulnerable to burnout, struggling with blurred work-life boundaries and reduced in-person touchpoints.

Even in the realm of social and environmental responsibility, where bold commitments are often made, the follow-through can feel superficial. Gen Z, in particular, wants to be part of the journey—not just hear about it in polished reports or external campaigns. They expect tangible action, measurable outcomes, and to be actively included in CSR and sustainability efforts that align with their personal values and everyday work.

Does your company truly deliver on its EVP?

During my HRD Conference session, I ran a live poll to test the sentiment in the room: “Does your company truly deliver on its EVP?”

Only one person felt their organisation’s EVP was fully embedded into daily culture. Most admitted there were gaps—some acknowledged inconsistencies, while others weren’t even sure if a clearly defined EVP existed at all.

These results didn’t surprise me—but they landed heavily. They confirmed what we’d been unpacking: that there’s often a significant disconnect between the employer brand promise and the lived employee experience. And that disconnect isn’t just an HR issue—it’s a culture issue, a trust issue, and ultimately a retention issue. That moment shifted the room.

Awarding SA and Africa's Top Employers for 2025

28 Feb 2025

What followed was a rich, honest conversation—one that surfaced the deep questions many HR leaders are grappling with today:

• Has EVP lost its meaning?
  
• How do we prevent it from becoming just another acronym?
  
• How do we meet employees halfway—what does give and take really look like?
  
• How do we manage expectations when business needs change—like when remote work is rolled back?

These weren’t just tactical questions—they were a call to rethink how we lead, how we communicate, and how we follow through on the promises we make. Because in times of rapid change, your EVP must be flexible enough to evolve—and strong enough to still feel real.

A truly effective EVP cannot be merely stated; it must be lived and experienced. When it’s not, it breeds distrust, disengagement, and unproductivity.

Making EVP real

In a world defined by change, your EVP must remain fluid—evolving to reflect the times. But it also needs to be more than just words. It must be operationalised—embedded into leadership behaviour, people processes, and everyday experiences.

If your employer brand isn’t lived, it isn’t real. And if it’s not real, it won’t retain, engage or attract the very people it was designed for.