The complex business of outsourcing and the implications of Section 197

Image source: xtockimages – 123RF.com

The King Cetshwayo District Municipality v Water and Sanitation Services South Africa case is a stark reminder that handing over services, especially in the public sector, can lead to a legal quagmire.

This isn't just a legal headache; it's a critical business lesson that can have far-reaching financial and operational consequences. Section 197 of the Labour Relations Act is not just a piece of legislation; it's a potential minefield for businesses navigating the complexities of service contracts.

Service agreement and question of transfer

For years, Water and Sanitation Services South Africa (WSSA) capably managed water and wastewater treatment facilities for the Municipality, winning successive tenders and renewals. Their service level agreement (SLA) seemed straightforward enough.

However, when the final renewal period concluded, WSSA raised a critical point: the Key Labour Principle clause in the SLA suggested employees should transfer to either the Municipality or the next service provider. WSSA believed this constituted a transfer of business as a going concern under Section 197.

New owner, same employment contract: Court reiterates original retirement age applies

Chloë Loubser  26 Mar 2025

The Municipality, however, saw this as nothing more than an attempt by WSSA to avoid their financial obligations, specifically retrenchment costs, arguing it was simply the end of a service contract. This disagreement set the stage for a legal battle with significant implications.

The courts ultimately sided with WSSA, and the reasoning behind this decision is crucial for any business involved in outsourcing, particularly in asset-heavy industries.

Nature of business

The core of the matter rested on the nature of the business – providing bulk water services. This wasn't just about manpower; it was fundamentally about infrastructure. Boreholes, pipes, reservoirs – these weren't just tools; they were the very essence of the business. When WSSA returned these assets to the Municipality, it effectively transferred the business's backbone.

The Municipality argued that no employees or customers were taken over, and certain assets weren't transferred, but the court deemed these arguments insufficient. The absence of employee transfer was deemed irrelevant in this specific instance, as the business was heavily asset-reliant.

No one-size-fits-all

Here's the kicker: the court emphasised that each case under Section 197 is highly fact-specific. There's no one-size-fits-all answer. However, the overarching takeaway is clear: if your business is asset-heavy and you outsource a core function that relies on those assets, you're potentially setting the stage for a Section 197 transfer when the contract ends. This isn't merely about ticking legal boxes; it's about strategic planning and risk management.

Businesses must thoroughly understand the implications of outsourcing assets. It's not just about delegating tasks; it's potentially about transferring a significant portion of your business.

Landmark ConCourt judgment reinforces employee rights in transfer case

Ali Sonday  12 Aug 2024

This case underscores the critical need for meticulously drafted contracts and a deep understanding of labour law. Ignoring these nuances can lead to costly legal battles and unexpected liabilities that can cripple an organisation.

Furthermore, the court rejected the Municipality's concern that every government tender termination would automatically trigger Section 197. Each situation must be assessed on its unique merits, focusing on the specific nature of the business or service provided. In the King Cetshwayo case, the Municipality was aware that continuity of service was essential, and if WSSA ceased operations, either the Municipality or another provider would step in. This awareness played a significant role in the court's decision.

Conclusion

In conclusion, outsourcing is far more complex than simply handing off tasks to another entity. It's a multifaceted strategic decision that requires careful consideration of legal, financial, and operational factors.

The King Cetshwayo case serves as a crucial reminder that businesses, especially those dealing with asset-heavy operations, must consider the full scope of their actions.

Ignoring the potential implications of Section 197, particularly when assets are involved, could very well leave you navigating a legal minefield with potentially disastrous consequences. It's a lesson in due diligence, foresight, and the importance of understanding the fine print in every contract.